The sustainable investor for a changing world
Energy_transition_infographic_building_1440x300
  • Home
  • The latest on the carbon trading market and a keen appetite for offshore wind assets

The latest on the carbon trading market and a keen appetite for offshore wind assets

Responsible Investing

BNP Paribas Asset Management
 

In a fast changing world, our focus is on achieving long-term sustainable investment returns for our clients.

Carbon pricing in the EU Emissions Trading System, or ETS market, is entering a new phase, signalling that decarbonisation is well under way in the energy sector and that reducing industrial CO2 emissions will be next, as the EU moves towards its net zero emissions target for 2050.

Prices of carbon emission allowances in the ETS, the largest and most liquid carbon market in the world, have been rising since the middle of 2020 after the EU announced its net zero plan, aiming to have a legally binding decarbonisation goal for member states in place by this summer.

Year to date, the price has increased by more than 30%, recently setting an all-time high at around EUR 40 a tonne before entering a modest correction. The higher the price of carbon, the greater incentive there is for emitters to “decarbonise” by switching to alternatives in the renewable energy sector.

In fact, pricing the cost of releasing CO2 into the atmosphere is the EU’s main policy tool to achieve its commitment to net zero. The ETS covers roughly 50% of all the emissions in the EU.

It can be seen as a market mechanism that encourages emitters to reallocate their resources in the most efficient way, i.e. to cleaner technologies and products that do not involve production methods incurring a cost for the CO2 emitted.

A new paradigm for carbon pricing?

We believe the carbon market is now looking for a new paradigm with prices being adjusted to much higher levels that incentivise the use of green hydrogen, which is produced using renewable electricity. This energy source is seen as key to enabling the EU to reach its net zero target.

At the same, the EU is working to ensure that its carbon reduction efforts including carbon pricing do not undermine industry’s competitiveness relative to other jurisdictions.

In that context, the EU is looking at ways to limit speculative inflows from financial investors into the carbon market, while also investigating ways to impose a carbon tax on imports from countries without a carbon pricing system at the border to ensure a level playing field.

Offshore wind – paying more, or charging more, to play?

Is there also a new phase in the bidding for offshore wind capacity and hence the cost (of the energy transition) for consumers and the returns available for investors?

The latest auction of rights to develop offshore wind capacity – in the waters around England and Wales – has thrown up some developments that bear watching closely. For the first time, it included an auction to lease the seabed for 60 years at an annual fee coming to a total GBP 880 million. [1]

While the extra revenue is welcome to the seller – the UK government – the additional costs of the lease will have to be borne by the consumers of the electricity, the project developer or the offshore-wind industry’s equipment suppliers, or all three. This could boost the average power price by nearly 25% or almost halve the rate of return for the developer.

The UK is currently the largest and most dynamic offshore wind market in the world, with 10 gigawatts (GW) already in operation and a further 29GW under construction or planned. The country is also preparing to host COP26 in Glasgow later this year – the most important UN climate-change conference since Paris in 2015. Accordingly, developments in this market are watched closely.

Raising developer’s costs and investors’ eyebrows

If the pressure on returns becomes a trend, it could drive up the cost of shifting from fossil-fired electricity to renewables in the wholesale market. The extra cost from seabed-lease options would alter the economics of offshore wind relative to gas-turbine (CCGT) power stations materially. It would also affect the transition from gas to electricity in the retail market. Both shifts are fundamental pillars of strategies to zero carbon emissions in 30-40 years’ time.

The seabed-lease auction raises questions about the ability of the existing leaders in offshore wind – utilities – to continue winning new projects at the rate of return they have done previously.

Vigilance required

It also highlights issues around the ability of Big Oil to pivot to green energy at acceptable levels of return. One Big Oil company was part of the consortium making the highest – winning – bid and appeared willing to a pay a significant premium to get a foothold in the offshore wind market, possibly setting a precedent that will force future bidders to be equally competitive.

Big Oil’s apparent interest comes at a time when oil majors are increasingly under pressure to pivot away from fossil fuel exploration and production and change their business models.

Finally, the high price paid points to possible trade-offs between (the need for) government revenues, (affordable) consumer prices, and (attractive) investor returns.

Investors will need to watch whether other governments will copy the new model for awarding seabed leases. Governments might be tempted to seek a higher windfall, but investors will need to press companies to ensure that targeted rates of return and capital discipline match up.

 

[1] See Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4 signals major vote of confidence in the UK’s green economy https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/en-gb/media-and-insights/news/2021-offshore-wind-leasing-round-4-signals-major-vote-of-confidence-in-the-uk-s-green-economy/


 

This material is issued and has been prepared by a representative of BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Australia Limited (“BNPP AMAU”) AFSL 223418 ABN 78 008 576 449.

This material is produced for information purposes only and does not constitute:
1. an offer to buy nor a solicitation to sell, nor shall it form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever or
2. investment advice.

Opinions included in this material constitute the judgement of BNPP AMAU at the time specified and may be subject to change without notice. BNPP AMAU is not obliged to update or alter the information or opinions contained within this material. Investors should consult their own legal and tax advisors in respect of legal, accounting, domicile and tax advice prior to investing in the financial instrument(s) in order to make an independent determination of the suitability and consequences of an investment therein, if permitted. Please note that different types of investments, if contained within this material, involve varying degrees of risk and there can be no assurance that any specific investment may either be suitable, appropriate or profitable for an investor’s investment portfolio.

Given the economic and market risks, there can be no assurance that the financial instrument(s) will achieve its/their investment objectives. Returns may be affected by, amongst other things, investment strategies or objectives of the financial instrument(s) and material market and economic conditions, including interest rates, market terms and general market conditions. The different strategies applied to the financial instruments may have a significant effect on the results portrayed in this material.

All information referred to in the present document is available on www.bnpparibas-am.com

 

On the same subject:

diving_sea_water_biodiversity_isr_1440x300
January 28, 2021 3 min
ESG/SRI, Responsible Investing